↓ Skip to main content

Pancake Syndrome (Oral Mite Anaphylaxis)

Overview of attention for article published in World Allergy Organization Journal, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pancake Syndrome (Oral Mite Anaphylaxis)
Published in
World Allergy Organization Journal, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1939-4551-2-5-91
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Sánchez-Borges, Raúl Suárez-Chacon, Arnaldo Capriles-Hulett, Fernan Caballero-Fonseca, Victor Iraola, Enrique Fernández-Caldas

Abstract

Oral mite anaphylaxis is a new syndrome characterized by severe allergic manifestations occurring in atopic patients shortly after the intake of foods made with mite-contaminated wheat flour. This clinical entity, observed more frequently in tropical/subtropical environments, is more often triggered by pancakes and for that reason it has been designated "pancake syndrome". Because cooked foods are able to induce the symptoms, it has been proposed that thermoresistant allergens are involved in its production. A novel variety of this syndrome occurs during physical exercise and therefore has been named dust mite ingestion-associated exercise-induced anaphylaxis. To prevent mite proliferation and the production of anaphylaxis, it has been recommended that wheat flour be stored at low temperatures in the refrigerator.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,423,844
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from World Allergy Organization Journal
#51
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,772
of 102,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Allergy Organization Journal
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them