You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health systems frameworks in their political context: framing divergent agendas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-774 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josefien van Olmen, Bruno Marchal, Wim Van Damme, Guy Kegels, Peter S Hill |
| Abstract |
Despite the mounting attention for health systems and health systems theories, there is a persisting lack of consensus on their conceptualisation and strengthening. This paper contributes to structuring the debate, presenting landmarks in the development of health systems thinking against the backdrop of the policy context and its dominant actors. We argue that frameworks on health systems are products of their time, emerging from specific discourses. They are purposive, not neutrally descriptive, and are shaped by the agendas of their authors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 20% |
| Belgium | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Palestine, State of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 25% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 486 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 2 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 467 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 97 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 16% |
| Researcher | 65 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 89 | 18% |
| Unknown | 88 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 162 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 75 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 61 | 13% |
| Unknown | 108 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,200,191
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,323
of 16,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,758
of 175,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#15
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.