↓ Skip to main content

Collateral damages in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemia– two cases

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Collateral damages in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemia– two cases
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42466-020-00080-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Urbanek, Jana Kötteritzsch, Wolfgang Zink, Armin J. Grau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 39 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 39 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#18,769,480
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#118
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,465
of 415,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.