↓ Skip to main content

Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-00943-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cécile Vuillermoz, Lise Eilin Stene, Lydéric Aubert, Yvon Motreff, Philippe Pirard, Thierry Baubet, Sophie Lesieur, Pierre Chauvin, Stéphanie Vandentorren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Professor 2 4%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 17 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 22%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 17 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,572,454
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#993
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,977
of 365,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#34
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.