You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RNA-Seq reveals complex genetic response to deepwater horizon oil release in Fundulus grandis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-13-474 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tzintzuni I Garcia, Yingjia Shen, Douglas Crawford, Marjorie F Oleksiak, Andrew Whitehead, Ronald B Walter |
| Abstract |
The release of oil resulting from the blowout of the Deepwater Horizon (DH) drilling platform was one of the largest in history discharging more than 189 million gallons of oil and subject to widespread application of oil dispersants. This event impacted a wide range of ecological habitats with a complex mix of pollutants whose biological impact is still not yet fully understood. To better understand the effects on a vertebrate genome, we studied gene expression in the salt marsh minnow Fundulus grandis, which is local to the northern coast of the Gulf of Mexico and is a sister species of the ecotoxicological model Fundulus heteroclitus. To assess genomic changes, we quantified mRNA expression using high throughput sequencing technologies (RNA-Seq) in F. grandis populations in the marshes and estuaries impacted by DH oil release. This application of RNA-Seq to a non-model, wild, and ecologically significant organism is an important evaluation of the technology to quickly assess similar events in the future. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2012.
All research outputs
#1,922,827
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#522
of 10,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,953
of 168,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#5
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.