You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A buffered form of creatine does not promote greater changes in muscle creatine content, body composition, or training adaptations than creatine monohydrate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-9-43 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew R Jagim, Jonathan M Oliver, Adam Sanchez, Elfego Galvan, James Fluckey, Steven Riechman, Michael Greenwood, Katherine Kelly, Cynthia Meininger, Christopher Rasmussen, Richard B Kreider |
| Abstract |
Creatine monohydrate (CrM) has been consistently reported to increase muscle creatine content and improve high-intensity exercise capacity. However, a number of different forms of creatine have been purported to be more efficacious than CrM. The purpose of this study was to determine if a buffered creatine monohydrate (KA) that has been purported to promote greater creatine retention and training adaptations with fewer side effects at lower doses is more efficacious than CrM supplementation in resistance-trained individuals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 186 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 13% |
| Japan | 11 | 6% |
| Canada | 10 | 5% |
| Australia | 7 | 4% |
| Spain | 7 | 4% |
| Greece | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 76 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 145 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 13% |
| Scientists | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 19% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 35 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 63 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 263. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#142,321
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#55
of 955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,552
of 452,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#54
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.