↓ Skip to main content

Vaping patterns, nicotine dependence and reasons for vaping among American Indian dual users of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vaping patterns, nicotine dependence and reasons for vaping among American Indian dual users of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7523-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorothy A. Rhoades, Ashley L. Comiford, Justin D. Dvorak, Kai Ding, Michelle Hopkins, Paul Spicer, Theodore L. Wagener, Mark P. Doescher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Librarian 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 36 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Psychology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 41 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#13,002,100
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,922
of 15,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,253
of 340,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#133
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.