↓ Skip to main content

Development of a rapid and inexpensive method to reveal natural antisense transcripts

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a rapid and inexpensive method to reveal natural antisense transcripts
Published in
Plant Methods, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-8-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvio Collani, Silvio Collani, Gianni Barcaccia

Abstract

Natural antisense transcripts (NATs) are a group of RNAs encoded within a cell that have transcript complementarity to other RNA transcripts. NATs have been identified in multiple eukaryotes, including humans, mice, yeast and several plants, and are known to play crucial roles in gene regulation and modification via RNA interference, alternative splicing and genomic imprinting. NATs are also involved in several human diseases.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 3%
France 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Other 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 78%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Unknown 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2012.
All research outputs
#3,079,356
of 4,507,144 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#144
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,390
of 78,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.