You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of metastasis between early-onset and late-onset gastric signet ring cell carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Gastroenterology, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12876-020-01529-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qiang-Ping Zhou, Yong-Hua Ge, Cheng-Yuan Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
Other | 2 | 25% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Psychology | 1 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,572,454
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#399
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,402
of 412,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.