You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Novel biomarkers with promising benefits for diagnosis of cervical neoplasia: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infectious Agents and Cancer, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13027-020-00335-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Calleb George Onyango, Lilian Ogonda, Bernard Guyah, Clement Shiluli, Gregory Ganda, Omenge Elkanah Orang’o, Kirtika Patel |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Kenya | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#12,805,274
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#151
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,397
of 377,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.