You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Scoping the impact of the national child measurement programme feedback on the child obesity pathway: study protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-783 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Catherine Falconer, MinHae Park, Áine Skow, James Black, Ulla Sovio, Sonia Saxena, Anthony Kessel, Helen Croker, Steve Morris, Russell Viner, Sanjay Kinra |
Abstract |
The National Child Measurement Programme was established to measure the height and weight of children at primary school in England and provides parents with feedback about their child's weight status. In this study we will evaluate the impact of the National Child Measurement Programme feedback on parental risk perceptions of overweight, lifestyle behaviour and health service use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
Researcher | 12 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 19% |
Psychology | 13 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,247,421
of 24,973,800 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,052
of 16,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,181
of 175,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#202
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,973,800 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.