| Title |
CovEMERALD: Assessing the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of remotely delivered Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing following Covid-19 related critical illness: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-020-04805-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Bates, Sophie Rushbrook, Elan Shapiro, Michael Grocott, Rebecca Cusack |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 342 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 9% |
| Researcher | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 65 | 19% |
| Unknown | 138 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 12% |
| Psychology | 35 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 150 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,566,759
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,031
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,979
of 527,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them