You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An unusual case of frost bite autoamputation of toes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cases Journal, December 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1757-1626-1-398 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adil Hafeez Wani, Mir Mohsin, Mohammed Ashraf Darzi, Mohammed Inam Zaroo, Sheikh Adil Bashir, Haroon Rashid Zargar, Altaf Rasool, Mohammed Akram Bijli, Hameedullah Dar, Peerzada Omar Farooq, Sheikh Tariq Ahmed |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#623,110
of 25,183,822 outputs
Outputs from Cases Journal
#5
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,860
of 182,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cases Journal
#4
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,183,822 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.