↓ Skip to main content

Qualitative exploration of public and smoker understanding of, and reactions to, an endgame solution to the tobacco epidemic

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Qualitative exploration of public and smoker understanding of, and reactions to, an endgame solution to the tobacco epidemic
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-782
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Edwards, Jo Peace, Marie Russell, Heather Gifford, George Thomson, Nick Wilson

Abstract

There is increasing interest in ending the tobacco epidemic and in applying 'endgame' solutions to achieve that goal at national levels. We explored the understanding of, and reactions to, a tobacco-free vision and an endgame approach to tobacco control among New Zealand smokers and non-smokers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Singapore 1 3%
Tunisia 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 33 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 27%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Unspecified 6 16%
Social Sciences 6 16%
Psychology 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,314,922
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,763
of 14,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,250
of 168,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#278
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.