↓ Skip to main content

Prehabilitation programs for cancer patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (protocol)

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prehabilitation programs for cancer patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (protocol)
Published in
Systematic Reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-1282-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose F. Meneses-Echávez, Andrés F. Loaiza-Betancur, Víctor Díaz-López, Andrés M. Echavarría-Rodríguez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 16%
Sports and Recreations 5 11%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,869,337
of 23,604,080 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#948
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,736
of 459,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#23
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,604,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.