↓ Skip to main content

Prehabilitation programs for cancer patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (protocol)

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prehabilitation programs for cancer patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (protocol)
Published in
Systematic Reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-1282-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meneses-Echávez, Jose F., Loaiza-Betancur, Andrés F., Díaz-López, Víctor, Echavarría-Rodríguez, Andrés M.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Other 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Sports and Recreations 3 12%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,422,017
of 16,726,235 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#849
of 1,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,418
of 377,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#145
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,726,235 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.