You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Variation in IgE binding potencies of seven Artemisia species depending on content of major allergens
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13601-020-00354-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lan Zhao, Wanyi Fu, Biyuan Gao, Yi Liu, Shandong Wu, Zhi Chen, Xianqi Zhang, Huiying Wang, Yan Feng, Xueyan Wang, Hongtian Wang, Tianfei Lan, Meiling Liu, Xuefeng Wang, Yuemei Sun, Fangmei Luo, Gabriele Gadermaier, Fatima Ferreira, Serge A. Versteeg, Jaap H. Akkerdaas, Deyun Wang, Rudolf Valenta, Susanne Vrtala, Zhongshan Gao, Ronald van Ree |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Romania | 2 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
Mexico | 1 | 10% |
France | 1 | 10% |
Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
Jordan | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Psychology | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,138,654
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#339
of 676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,745
of 506,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.