You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. Part 2: Herbal medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-1-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Klaus Linde, Gerben ter Riet, Maria Hondras, Andrew Vickers, Reinhard Saller, Dieter Melchart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 40 | 27% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,251,053
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,034
of 3,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,765
of 38,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.