↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathias Ried-Larsen, Jan Christian Brønd, Søren Brage, Bjørge Herman Hansen, May Grydeland, Lars Bo Andersen, Niels Christian Møller

Abstract

More studies include multiple generations of the Actigraph activity monitor. So far no studies have compared the output including the newest generation and investigated the impact on the output of the activity monitor when enabling the low frequency extension (LFE) option. The aims were to study the responses of four generations (AM7164, GT1M, GT3X and GT3X+) of the Actigraph activity monitor in a mechanical setup and a free living environment with and without enabling the LFE option.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 22 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#2,034
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,572
of 187,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#36
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.