↓ Skip to main content

Regional differences between superficial and deep lumbar multifidus in patients with chronic lumbar spine pathology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regional differences between superficial and deep lumbar multifidus in patients with chronic lumbar spine pathology
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12891-020-03791-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Padwal, David B. Berry, James C. Hubbard, Vinko Zlomislic, R. Todd Allen, Steven R. Garfin, Samuel R. Ward, Bahar Shahidi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 19%
Sports and Recreations 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,123,930
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,346
of 4,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,733
of 508,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#32
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.