You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular characterization of Ribosomal DNA (ITS2) of hard ticks in Iran: understanding the conspecificity of Dermacentor marginatus and D. niveus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-020-05326-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Parisa Soltan-Alinejad, Zahra Ramezani, Hamideh Edalat, Zakkyeh Telmadarraiy, Farrokh Dabiri, Hassan Vatandoost, Mohammad Ali Oshaghi, Mehdi Mohebali, Seyyed Javad Seyyed-Zadeh, Zabihollah Zarei, Haleh Hanifian, Faham Faghihi, Mandan Abolhasani, Mulood Mohammadi Bavani, Jalil Musavi, Olle Terenius, Ali Reza Chavshin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 20% |
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,653,388
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,342
of 4,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,356
of 416,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#36
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.