| Title |
Dosing of thromboprophylaxis and mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03375-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Jonmarker, Jacob Hollenberg, Martin Dahlberg, Otto Stackelberg, Jacob Litorell, Åsa H. Everhov, Hans Järnbert-Pettersson, Mårten Söderberg, Jonathan Grip, Anna Schandl, Mattias Günther, Maria Cronhjort |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| France | 4 | 7% |
| Sweden | 3 | 5% |
| Mexico | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 63 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 31% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 71 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,225,606
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,019
of 6,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,000
of 523,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#31
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.