You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical disease progression and biomarkers in Niemann–Pick disease type C: a prospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13023-020-01616-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eugen Mengel, Bruno Bembi, Mireia del Toro, Federica Deodato, Matthias Gautschi, Stephanie Grunewald, Sabine Grønborg, Bénédicte Héron, Esther M. Maier, Agathe Roubertie, Saikat Santra, Anna Tylki-Szymanska, Simon Day, Tara Symonds, Stacie Hudgens, Marc C. Patterson, Christina Guldberg, Linda Ingemann, Nikolaj H. T. Petersen, Thomas Kirkegaard, Christine í Dali |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#18,108,894
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,054
of 2,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358,650
of 508,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#43
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.