↓ Skip to main content

Physiological functions of the effects of the different bathing method on recovery from local muscle fatigue

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiological Anthropology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 451)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological functions of the effects of the different bathing method on recovery from local muscle fatigue
Published in
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1880-6805-31-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soomin Lee, Shogo Ishibashi, Yoshihiro Shimomura, Tetsuo Katsuura

Abstract

Recently, mist saunas have been used in the home as a new bathing style in Japan. However, there are still few reports on the effects of bathing methods on recovery from muscle fatigue. Furthermore, the effect of mist sauna bathing on human physiological function has not yet been revealed. Therefore, we measured the physiological effects of bathing methods including the mist sauna on recovery from muscle fatigue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 16%
Lecturer 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 14 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Sports and Recreations 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,315,694
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#47
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,433
of 177,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.