↓ Skip to main content

Menstrual product choice and uptake among young women in Zimbabwe: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 928)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Menstrual product choice and uptake among young women in Zimbabwe: a pilot study
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40814-020-00728-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandikudza Tembo, Jenny Renju, Helen A. Weiss, Ethel Dauya, Tsitsi Bandason, Chido Dziva-Chikwari, Nicol Redzo, Constancia Mavodza, Tendai Losi, Rashida Ferrand, Suzanna C. Francis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 34 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Psychology 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 39 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#932,192
of 21,638,632 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#28
of 928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,397
of 498,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#4
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,638,632 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 498,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.