↓ Skip to main content

Development and randomized controlled trial evaluation of E-learning trainings for professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Public Health, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Development and randomized controlled trial evaluation of E-learning trainings for professionals
Published in
Archives of Public Health, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13690-020-00465-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisa König, Anna Maier, Jörg Michael Fegert, Ulrike Hoffmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 21 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 20 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#774
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#323,229
of 517,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#30
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.