| Title |
Design and impact evaluation of a digital reproductive health program in Rwanda using a cluster randomized design: study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-09746-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cara Nolan, Laura Packel, Rebecca Hope, Jordan Levine, Laura Baringer, Emmyson Gatare, Aline Umubyeyi, Felix Sayinzoga, Michael Mugisha, Janepher Turatsinze, Aimee Naganza, Laiah Idelson, Stefano Bertozzi, Sandra McCoy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 207 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 94 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 100 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#18,771,452
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,114
of 15,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,554
of 414,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#240
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.