You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancing the global physical activity agenda: recommendations for future research by the 2020 WHO physical activity and sedentary behavior guidelines development group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12966-020-01042-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Loretta DiPietro, Salih Saad Al-Ansari, Stuart J. H. Biddle, Katja Borodulin, Fiona C. Bull, Matthew P. Buman, Greet Cardon, Catherine Carty, Jean-Philippe Chaput, Sebastien Chastin, Roger Chou, Paddy C. Dempsey, Ulf Ekelund, Joseph Firth, Christine M. Friedenreich, Leandro Garcia, Muthoni Gichu, Russell Jago, Peter T. Katzmarzyk, Estelle Lambert, Michael Leitzmann, Karen Milton, Francisco B. Ortega, Chathuranga Ranasinghe, Emmanuel Stamatakis, Anne Tiedemann, Richard P. Troiano, Hidde P. van der Ploeg, Juana F. Willumsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 14% |
| Australia | 7 | 12% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 47% |
| Scientists | 25 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 557 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 557 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 9% |
| Researcher | 42 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 83 | 15% |
| Unknown | 256 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 58 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 4% |
| Psychology | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 60 | 11% |
| Unknown | 284 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#410,587
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#112
of 2,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,440
of 524,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.