↓ Skip to main content

Traditional medicinal plants in South Tyrol (northern Italy, southern Alps): biodiversity and use

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traditional medicinal plants in South Tyrol (northern Italy, southern Alps): biodiversity and use
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13002-020-00419-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua Petelka, Barbara Plagg, Ina Säumel, Stefan Zerbe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 22 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#12,891,543
of 19,508,584 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#475
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,203
of 469,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#28
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,508,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.