↓ Skip to main content

Perlecan domain 1 recombinant proteoglycan augments BMP-2 activity and osteogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perlecan domain 1 recombinant proteoglycan augments BMP-2 activity and osteogenesis
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-12-60
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arthur A DeCarlo, Maria Belousova, April L Ellis, Donald Petersen, Hernan Grenett, Patrick Hardigan, Robert O’Grady, Megan Lord, John M Whitelock

Abstract

Many growth factors, such as bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2, have been shown to interact with polymers of sulfated disacharrides known as heparan sulfate (HS) glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), which are found on matrix and cell-surface proteoglycans throughout the body. HS GAGs, and some more highly sulfated forms of chondroitin sulfate (CS), regulate cell function by serving as co-factors, or co-receptors, in GF interactions with their receptors, and HS or CS GAGs have been shown to be necessary for inducing signaling and GF activity, even in the osteogenic lineage. Unlike recombinant proteins, however, HS and CS GAGs are quite heterogenous due, in large part, to post-translational addition, then removal, of sulfate groups to various positions along the GAG polymer. We have, therefore, investigated whether it would be feasible to deliver a DNA pro-drug to generate a soluble HS/CS proteoglycan in situ that would augment the activity of growth-factors, including BMP-2, in vivo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Engineering 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,251,053
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#668
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,279
of 168,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.