↓ Skip to main content

Determining the weighting and relative importance of CanMEDS roles and competencies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determining the weighting and relative importance of CanMEDS roles and competencies
Published in
BMC Research Notes, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-354
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda J Stutsky, Marilyn Singer, Robert Renaud

Abstract

The CanMEDS roles and competencies are being used as the framework to support the development of the Manitoba Practice Assessment Program (MPAP) designed to assess the competence of physicians practicing with a conditional license. Establishing the link between clinical practice and assessment of performance is critical in the development of the MPAP. A first step in establishing this link is to identify activities performed in actual clinical practice as well as the importance of those activities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 43%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,166,700
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,547
of 4,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,053
of 163,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#96
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.