| Title |
A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-09875-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jodi Oakman, Natasha Kinsman, Rwth Stuckey, Melissa Graham, Victoria Weale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 21% |
| Ireland | 5 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 55% |
| Scientists | 11 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,080 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1080 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 144 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 115 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 6% |
| Researcher | 58 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 26 | 2% |
| Other | 123 | 11% |
| Unknown | 553 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 88 | 8% |
| Psychology | 82 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 68 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 6% |
| Other | 131 | 12% |
| Unknown | 582 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#249,916
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#227
of 17,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,128
of 528,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#6
of 337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.