↓ Skip to main content

To stimulate or not to stimulate? A rapid systematic review of repetitive sensory stimulation for the upper-limb following stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physiotherapy, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To stimulate or not to stimulate? A rapid systematic review of repetitive sensory stimulation for the upper-limb following stroke
Published in
Archives of Physiotherapy, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40945-020-00091-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel C. Stockley, Kerry Hanna, Louise Connell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 12 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,818,732
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physiotherapy
#76
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,007
of 508,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physiotherapy
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.