You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of a computerized decision support tool deployed in two intensive care units on acute kidney injury progression and guideline compliance: a prospective observational study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03343-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher Bourdeaux, Erina Ghosh, Louis Atallah, Krishnamoorthy Palanisamy, Payaal Patel, Matthew Thomas, Timothy Gould, John Warburton, Jon Rivers, John Hadfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
Malaysia | 1 | 14% |
China | 1 | 14% |
Belgium | 1 | 14% |
Namibia | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unspecified | 4 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
Unspecified | 4 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,694,955
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,127
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,067
of 517,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#94
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.