You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Retraction Note: Psychometric properties of a short version of the Job Anxiety Scale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01166-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bjarne Schmalbach, Andreas Kalkbrenner, Markus Bassler, Andreas Hinz, Katja Petrowski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 50% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Engineering | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,177,113
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#328
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,583
of 508,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.