↓ Skip to main content

‘I decided to go back to work so I can afford to buy her formula’: a longitudinal mixed-methods study to explore how women in informal work balance the competing demands of infant feeding and working…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘I decided to go back to work so I can afford to buy her formula’: a longitudinal mixed-methods study to explore how women in informal work balance the competing demands of infant feeding and working to provide for their family
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09917-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silondile Luthuli, Lyn Haskins, Sphindile Mapumulo, Nigel Rollins, Christiane Horwood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Lecturer 7 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 86 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Psychology 10 6%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 86 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#14,996,133
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,024
of 15,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,844
of 509,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#213
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.