You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing the effects of HIV self-testing to standard HIV testing for key populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01835-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. Charles Witzel, Ingrid Eshun-Wilson, Muhammad S. Jamil, Nerissa Tilouche, Carmen Figueroa, Cheryl C. Johnson, David Reid, Rachel Baggaley, Nandi Siegfried, Fiona M. Burns, Alison J. Rodger, Peter Weatherburn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 35% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 23% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 226 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 105 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 114 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,969,869
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,380
of 4,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,680
of 527,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#50
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.