↓ Skip to main content

The effect of a cold beverage during an exercise session combining both strength and energy systems development training on core temperature and markers of performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
twitter
51 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of a cold beverage during an exercise session combining both strength and energy systems development training on core temperature and markers of performance
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-9-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle LaFata, Amanda Carlson-Phillips, Stacy T Sims, Elizabeth M Russell

Abstract

Although studies have investigated the effects of hydration on performance measures, few studies have investigated how the temperature of the ingested liquid affects performance and core temperature during an exercise session. The hypothesis of the present study was that cold water would improve thermoregulation and performance as measured by bench repetitions to fatigue, broad jump for force and power and total time to exhaustion for cardiovascular fitness

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 26%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 24 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 29 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#233,611
of 25,400,630 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#89
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,924
of 447,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#88
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,400,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.