You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Will Mobile Diabetes Education Teams (MDETs) in primary care improve patient care processes and health outcomes? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-165 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Enza Gucciardi, Mariella Fortugno, Stacey Horodezny, Wendy Lou, Souraya Sidani, Sherry Espin, Fiona Webster, Baiju R Shah |
Abstract |
There is evidence to suggest that delivery of diabetes self-management support by diabetes educators in primary care may improve patient care processes and patient clinical outcomes; however, the evaluation of such a model in primary care is nonexistent in Canada. This article describes the design for the evaluation of the implementation of Mobile Diabetes Education Teams (MDETs) in primary care settings in Canada. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 216 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 38 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
Unspecified | 21 | 9% |
Researcher | 20 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 5% |
Other | 55 | 25% |
Unknown | 43 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 16% |
Unspecified | 21 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 8% |
Psychology | 9 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 13% |
Unknown | 55 | 25% |