↓ Skip to main content

Corticosteroid treatment for early acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Corticosteroid treatment for early acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40560-020-00510-y
Authors

Yohei Hirano, Shunsuke Madokoro, Yutaka Kondo, Ken Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanaka

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 7 25%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Unknown 9 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,242,238
of 19,806,963 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#201
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,678
of 475,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#39
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,806,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.