You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nanoparticle technology and its implications in endodontics: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomaterials Research, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40824-020-00198-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natasha Raura, Anirudh Garg, Arpit Arora, M. Roma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 180 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 97 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 98 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#14,267,034
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Biomaterials Research
#69
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,717
of 518,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomaterials Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them