You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review and validity assessment of methods used in discrete choice experiments of primary healthcare professionals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Economics Review, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13561-020-00295-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregory Merlo, Mieke van Driel, Lisa Hall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Librarian | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,656,702
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#265
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,418
of 508,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.