↓ Skip to main content

Examination of the efficacy of acute L-alanyl-L-glutamine ingestion during hydration stress in endurance exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examination of the efficacy of acute L-alanyl-L-glutamine ingestion during hydration stress in endurance exercise
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-7-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay R Hoffman, Nicholas A Ratamess, Jie Kang, Stephanie L Rashti, Neil Kelly, Adam M Gonzalez, Michael Stec, Steven Anderson, Brooke L Bailey, Linda M Yamamoto, Lindsay L Hom, Brian R Kupchak, Avery D Faigenbaum, Carl M Maresh

Abstract

The effect of acute L-alanyl-L-glutamine (AG; Sustamine) ingestion on performance changes and markers of fluid regulation, immune, inflammatory, oxidative stress, and recovery was examined in response to exhaustive endurance exercise, during and in the absence of dehydration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Master 13 10%
Researcher 12 10%
Other 8 6%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 27 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,573,063
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#565
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,357
of 436,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#550
of 854 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 854 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.