| Title |
Hyperimmune anti-COVID-19 IVIG (C-IVIG) Therapy for Passive Immunization of Severe and Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-020-04839-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaukat Ali, Shobha Luxmi, Fatima Anjum, Sheikh Muhammad Muhaymin, Syed Muneeb Uddin, Ayesha Ali, Mir Rashid Ali, Sohaib Tauheed, Mujtaba Khan, Mohsin Bajwa, Saif Ullah Baig, Elisha Shalim, Iqra Ahmed, Abdul Samad Khan, Saeed Quraishy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 19% |
| Unknown | 79 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 88 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2020.
All research outputs
#13,726,812
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#3,330
of 6,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,692
of 421,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#74
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.