↓ Skip to main content

Adiposity, metabolites, and colorectal cancer risk: Mendelian randomization study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
36 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adiposity, metabolites, and colorectal cancer risk: Mendelian randomization study
Published in
BMC Medicine, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12916-020-01855-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline J. Bull, Joshua A. Bell, Neil Murphy, Eleanor Sanderson, George Davey Smith, Nicholas J. Timpson, Barbara L. Banbury, Demetrius Albanes, Sonja I. Berndt, Stéphane Bézieau, D. Timothy Bishop, Hermann Brenner, Daniel D. Buchanan, Andrea Burnett-Hartman, Graham Casey, Sergi Castellví-Bel, Andrew T. Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Amanda J. Cross, Albert de la Chapelle, Jane C. Figueiredo, Steven J. Gallinger, Susan M. Gapstur, Graham G. Giles, Stephen B. Gruber, Andrea Gsur, Jochen Hampe, Heather Hampel, Tabitha A. Harrison, Michael Hoffmeister, Li Hsu, Wen-Yi Huang, Jeroen R. Huyghe, Mark A. Jenkins, Corinne E. Joshu, Temitope O. Keku, Tilman Kühn, Sun-Seog Kweon, Loic Le Marchand, Christopher I. Li, Li Li, Annika Lindblom, Vicente Martín, Anne M. May, Roger L. Milne, Victor Moreno, Polly A. Newcomb, Kenneth Offit, Shuji Ogino, Amanda I. Phipps, Elizabeth A. Platz, John D. Potter, Conghui Qu, J. Ramón Quirós, Gad Rennert, Elio Riboli, Lori C. Sakoda, Clemens Schafmayer, Robert E. Schoen, Martha L. Slattery, Catherine M. Tangen, Kostas K. Tsilidis, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Fränzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Bethany van Guelpen, Kala Visvanathan, Pavel Vodicka, Ludmila Vodickova, Hansong Wang, Emily White, Alicja Wolk, Michael O. Woods, Anna H. Wu, Peter T. Campbell, Wei Zheng, Ulrike Peters, Emma E. Vincent, Marc J. Gunter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 35 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 39 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#201,245
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#172
of 3,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,286
of 489,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#6
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 489,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.