↓ Skip to main content

Characterisation and comparison of adipose tissue macrophages from human subcutaneous, visceral and perivascular adipose tissue

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterisation and comparison of adipose tissue macrophages from human subcutaneous, visceral and perivascular adipose tissue
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12967-016-0962-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivana Kralova Lesna, Anna Kralova, Sona Cejkova, Jiri Fronek, Marek Petras, Alena Sekerkova, Filip Thieme, Libor Janousek, Rudolf Poledne

Abstract

Macrophages play important roles in adipose tissue inflammation and its consequences. Unfortunately, a detailed description of the macrophage phenotypes in different human adipose tissues is not available. Subcutaneous, visceral and perivascular adipose tissues were obtained from 52 living kidney donors during live donor nephrectomy. Stromal vascular fractions were isolated, and the macrophage phenotypes were analyzed by flow cytometry using surface markers (CD14, CD16, CD36, and CD163). In addition to CD16 positivity, pro-inflammatory macrophages also display high scavenger receptor CD36 expression. The great majority of CD16 negative macrophages express the anti-inflammatory CD163 marker. The presence of pro-inflammatory macrophages was almost twice as high in visceral (p < 0.0001) and perivascular (p < 0.0001) adipose tissues than in subcutaneous tissue. This difference was substantially more pronounced in the postmenopausal women subgroup, consequentlly, the total difference was driven by this subgroup. We obtained detailed information about M1 and M2 macrophage phenotypes in human adipose tissue. The visceral and perivascular adipose tissues had substantially higher pro-inflammatory characteristics than the subcutaneous tissue. The higher proportion of pro-inflammatory macrophages in the visceral adipose tissue of postmenopausal women might be related to an increased cardiovascular risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,379,760
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,238
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,142
of 354,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#61
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.