You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Suicidal ideation in adolescents and their caregivers: a cross sectional survey in Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-016-0934-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kentaro Kawabe, Fumie Horiuchi, Marina Ochi, Yasunori Oka, Shu-ichi Ueno |
| Abstract |
Suicide is a leading cause of death in adolescence. Effective strategies are required to prevent suicide. We aimed to assess the prevalence of suicidal ideation in early teens and the relationship between family mental health and suicidal ideation of their child. A population-based survey in a rural town included 185 junior high school students and their caregivers. Suicidal ideation and mental states were assessed with General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and Profile of Mood States (POMS) form. Nineteen (10.3 %) students experienced suicidal ideation in the preceding weeks and had more mental health problems than students without suicidal ideation. Caregivers of students with suicidal ideation demonstrated significantly higher suicidal depression scores in GHQ. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that suicidal depression of caregivers was the most important factor for suicidal ideation of students. Suicidal ideation of children is associated with suicidal depression of their caregivers. For the prevention of suicide in adolescents, not only their own mental status but also that of caregivers should be taken into consideration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 28 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,335,423
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#4,223
of 4,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,242
of 354,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#98
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.