↓ Skip to main content

A randomized controlled trial of long term effect of BCM guided fluid management in MHD patients (BOCOMO study): rationales and study design

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized controlled trial of long term effect of BCM guided fluid management in MHD patients (BOCOMO study): rationales and study design
Published in
BMC Nephrology, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2369-13-120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Liu, Gang Long, Jianwei Ren, Jijun Li, Jinsheng Xu, Jinghong Lei, Mao Li, Moyan Qiu, Ping Yuan, Weiming Sun, Shan Lin, Wenjun Liu, Yi Sun, Yingchun Ma, Yonghui Mao, Yulan Shen, Li Zuo

Abstract

Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) has been reported as helpful in identifying hypervolemia. Observation data showed that hypervolemic maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients identified using BIA methods have higher mortality risk. However, it is not known if BIA-guided fluid management can improve MHD patients' survival. The objectives of the BOCOMO study are to evaluate the outcome of BIA guided fluid management compared with standard care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,316,001
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#1,859
of 2,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,333
of 171,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#17
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,452 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.