↓ Skip to main content

Local signs at insertion site and catheter-related bloodstream infections: an observational post hoc analysis using individual data of four RCTs

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local signs at insertion site and catheter-related bloodstream infections: an observational post hoc analysis using individual data of four RCTs
Published in
Critical Care, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03425-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niccolò Buetti, Stéphane Ruckly, Jean-Christophe Lucet, Lila Bouadma, Maité Garrouste-Orgeas, Carole Schwebel, Olivier Mimoz, Bertrand Souweine, Jean-François Timsit

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 21%
Psychology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,763,735
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,249
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,523
of 517,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#76
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.