You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Description and outcome of a cohort of 8 patients with WHIM syndrome from the French Severe Chronic Neutropenia Registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-7-71 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Beaussant Cohen, Odile Fenneteau, Emmanuel Plouvier, Pierre-Simon Rohrlich, Gerard Daltroff, Isabelle Plantier, Alain Dupuy, Delphine Kerob, Blandine Beaupain, Pierre Bordigoni, Fanny Fouyssac, Anne-Lise Delezoide, Gilles Devouassoux, Jean François Nicolas, Philippe Bensaid, Yves Bertrand, Karl Balabanian, Christine Bellanne Chantelot, Françoise Bachelerie, Jean Donadieu |
| Abstract |
WHIM syndrome (WS), a rare congenital neutropenia due to mutations of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor, is associated with Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-induced Warts, Hypogammaglobulinemia, bacterial Infections and Myelokathexis. The long term follow up of eight patients highlights the clinical heterogeneity of this disease as well as the main therapeutic approaches and remaining challenges in the light of the recent development of new CXCR4 inhibitors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,428,231
of 24,321,976 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#311
of 2,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,045
of 174,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,321,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.