↓ Skip to main content

Rethinking the service delivery system of psychological interventions in low and middle income countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rethinking the service delivery system of psychological interventions in low and middle income countries
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0938-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. K. Murray, M. J. D. Jordans

Abstract

Global mental health is a growing field intricately connected to broader health, violence and economic issues. Despite the high prevalence and cost of mental health disorders, an estimated 75 % of those with need in lower resource settings do not receive intervention. Most studies to date have examined the effectiveness of single-disorder mental health treatments - an approach that may be a significant challenge to scale-up and sustainability in lower resource settings. This paper presents a brief overview of the scientific progress in global mental health, and suggests consideration of an internal stepped care delivery approach. An internal stepped care model is one idea of a delivery system, utilizing a common elements approach, where the same provider could navigate between different elements based on severity and type of problems of the client. It is distinct from traditional stepped care models in that clients remain with the same provider, rather than relying on referral systems. An internal stepped care delivery system based on a simplified common elements approach could be more efficient, scalable, sustainable, and reduce the loss of clients to referrals in lower resource settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 41 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 28%
Social Sciences 17 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 54 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2016.
All research outputs
#16,099,609
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,579
of 4,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,620
of 358,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#79
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.